post for wed octber 6

my topic is on little league baseball.  THe topic sentence would go as follows: Little league is a unstanding and progressive organization.  This beleif is do to the history of little league baseball and howw it handled both sexism and racial issues.  In both cases the organization handled the matters in ways to appees those who contested there rules.  L.L handled the situation and grew from it.  Also the focus of the paper will be on Stotz. Stotz was the president of L.L when all of the exclusionary measures were taken.  When Stazt left the organization, they included everyone.  this is the beauty of L.L. 

My sources are from newarticles and a book entitled Play Ball.  THese sources were gathered at the Little LEague Museam in Wiliamsport Penn.  THe back my conclusion of L.L's inclusionary nature.  The missing arguement in the sources would be the one that does not agree with mine.  My paper would be better servered if i could find an article (or any thing) that says that the organization is and was filled with racist and sexist.  This will be the weak point of my paper, no contridictory evidence.  THe sources i have found are strong and very aplicable.  i gathered newpaper articles from the Williamsport newspaper and press releases by the Boy's town of America.  These are my most solid sources.  My secondary source is strong and encapslates all of L.L's histroy.